Submitted conference papers will be reviewed by technical committees of the Conference. Completed papers (MS Word and PDF format) should be emailed to email@example.com before the deadline.
All accepted papers will be published in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Proceedings Series publish by IOP Publisher in UK indexed by Scopus.
By submitting a paper an author and all co-authors are assumed to agree with the terms of the Proceedings Licence.
We look forward to receiving your papers and to welcoming you to the NICTE 2019 International Conference at Engineering Faculty Nommensen HKBP University, Medan, Indonesia.
Peer Review Process
All submitted full papers will be peer reviewed. The acceptance will be granted if the recommendations from the reviewers are positive. The criteria are based on the technical contents, clarity and format. Authors should make sure the submitted papers use the template for this conference. There are three review processes: Initial Review, Peer Review and Recommendation.
The committee evaluated each manuscript in the submission track to determine if its topic and content is suitable for consideration for the Nommensen International Conference in Technology and Engineering 2017 (NICT2017) before being reviewed. Manuscripts that do not meet minimum criteria are returned to the authors. This is in the best interest of the authors who could then decide to either correct the problems or to submit the manuscript to a more appropriate venue, avoiding delays from a lengthy review process that would nonetheless lead to rejection.
Manuscripts that pass the initial review by the committee, will be sent to several referees based on their expertise. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two referees. The referees are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, soundness of methodology, impact to design research, and relevance to design practices. To facilitate timely publication, referees are asked to complete their reviews and provide individual critiques within two weeks. After collecting the referees' reports, the committee makes a recommendation on the acceptability of the manuscript.
Based on the referees' comments, the committee makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and communicates to the authors the decision, along with referees' reports. The status reports to reviewers should identify the reviewers of each paper, the final decision can be "Accept Submission", "Revisions Require", or "Decline Submission." The revised version should be submitted considering the review comments.